NotÃcias
chatGPT
Categorias
Tags
Tags
academic event
academic publication
academic research
academic writing
artificial intelligence
arts-based research
call for abstracts
call for papers
CAQDAS
chatGPT
Computer Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software
conference
content analysis
Data Analysis
data analysis techniques
education research
flowcharts
healthcare research
hybrid conference
maps
New Trends in Qualitative Research
NTQR
qualitative analysis
Qualitative Analysis Software
Qualitative Data
Qualitative Data Analysis
Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Research
Qualitative Researchers
Research
research methods
science
scientific production
scientific writing
scopus
social research
Social Sciences
tables
visual outputs of qualitative data
WCQR
WCQR2024
web of science
webQDA
world conference
World Conference on Qualitative Research
Publicações
Eventos
WCQR2025 – 9th World Conference on Qualitative Research
The 9th World Conference on Qualitative Research (WCQR2025) will be held from 4 to 6 February 2025 at Jagiellonian University,…
This paper focuses on qualitative research in its various forms, highlighting the emergent and iterative epistemological features of qualitative data collection and analysis.
Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, particularly Generative AI (GenAI), as support for writing scientific articles can be a valuable approach, especially during the literature review phase.
Incorporating AI into Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) presents unprecedented potential and intricate ethical dilemmas in the swiftly evolving landscape of qualitative data analysis.
A utilização de Inteligência Artificial no processo de escrita académica coloca-nos num equilÃbrio delicado entre o potencial enriquecedor e a integridade.
Using Artificial Intelligence in the academic writing process places us in a delicate balance between enriching potential and integrity
The use of automation and artificial intelligence in qualitative data analysis should be seen as a tool to help researchers in their projects rather than a substitute for their expertise.
Reviewing articles, projects, and reports, among others, is one of the most relevant activities in science. In the age of Artificial Intelligence, are we close to being able to do without reviewers or will we start a hybrid process?